Service
Test Automation Services
Automation built in your framework, committed to your repository, and maintained so it doesn't decay. Generated by the QASource Intelligent Platform (QASIP) and verified by a QASource engineer before anything enters your suite.
What We Cover
- UI Automation Across Web, Mobile and Desktop: Playwright, Selenium, Cypress or whatever your team already runs.
- API and Service Automation: REST, SOAP, and GraphQL, including contract tests for services that change independently of you.
- Framework Design and Migration: Building a framework where none exists or moving an existing suite between frameworks.
- CI/CD Integration: Jenkins, GitLab CI, CircleCI or Azure DevOps, triggered by your pipeline on your branching model.
- Suite Maintenance: Drift detection, script repair, deduplication, and retirement of tests that no longer earn their runtime.
- Coverage Measured Against Change: What fraction of this release's changed surface was actually exercised, rather than a pass count.
How This Is Different From Buying Automation
- Every script is committed to your repository, in your framework and language, and is your property. If the engagement ends, you keep everything, and it keeps running.
- Generation is fast; verification is the point. A QASource engineer reviews every generated case and script for correctness and intent before it is committed.
- Most clients buy automation as part of a dedicated QA team, priced as a team. A framework migration with a defined finish is priced as an outcome.
- Maintenance is part of the work, not a renegotiation. Six months in, a suite that has decayed into skipped tests has cost you more than it has saved.
The hard part of automation was never writing the first thousand tests. It is owning them in year three.
We Ran It on Ourselves First
We ran Selenium for 20 years across a large part of our client base. Playwright is materially better: faster to execute, far cheaper to maintain, fewer false positives. So we migrated our own suite using QASIP, with 70–80% less effort than a manual migration would have taken. That's the least forgiving migration we could have chosen, and it's the reason we'll describe what a framework transition costs rather than only what it gains. The full account →
Where This Sits
Most clients don't buy automation on its own. They hand over the quality function, and automation is part of what it does. If that's closer to what you need, start there instead.
Tell Us What Your Suite Costs You to Own
Describe your framework, your run times and your maintenance burden. We'll come back with a proposal within two business days of the first conversation.