AI has made engineering teams faster, but faster is now outpacing stable, and the gap is showing up in incidents, fragile releases, and teams that can't explain what they shipped. This piece gives a practical framework to govern AI adoption before the velocity becomes a liability.
Continue Reading→One study says AI makes developers 56% faster. Another says 19% slower. Working closely with engineering leaders across the US and Europe, we have seen both play out. This blog unpacks what actually determines which side of that gap your organization lands on.
Continue Reading→AI-assisted development has removed the independence between code and the tests meant to check it. When the same AI writes both in one session, the tests confirm what the code does, not what it should do.
Continue Reading→This blog explores how AI-driven development is accelerating code output while weakening quality signals, highlighting risks like flaky tests and pipeline decay. It outlines how engineering leaders can reposition QA into a strategic function with guardrails, governance, and observability.
Continue Reading→